Web applications engineered for scale

Web application development is the engineering of software that runs in the browser: single-page apps, dashboards, portals, e-commerce platforms, and real-time tools. Unlike a static website, a web application is interactive and data-driven, and it usually connects to a backend, a database, and third-party services.

Yes. We work full-stack. On the front end we build in React and Next.js with TypeScript; on the back end we work in Node.js, NestJS, Django, and Python or FastAPI. One team owns the whole stack (UI, APIs, database, and deployment) so nothing gets lost between vendors.

React, Next.js, and TypeScript on the front end; Node.js, NestJS, Django, and FastAPI on the back end; PostgreSQL, MySQL, and Redis for data; and Docker and Kubernetes for deployment. For real-time features we use WebSockets and gRPC. We pick the stack to fit your product, not the other way around.

Yes. Our e-commerce web development covers custom storefronts, headless CMS content, and checkout flows with payment callbacks verified server-side before an order is saved. We build for conversion and for scale, whether you sell a handful of products or run a full catalog.

Every project ships through CI/CD with code review, type-checking, and staging environments, and deploys in containers on Docker and Kubernetes for predictable, staged rollouts. On security we enforce role-based access control, keep secrets server-side behind a backend-for-frontend layer, and cryptographically verify payment callbacks before trusting them.

A web development company gives you a full team (engineering, architecture, and delivery) under one contract, with the seniority to make architecture decisions you won't have to unwind later. As a web app development agency, we own the whole build and stay accountable for it after launch, rather than handing back code and disappearing.

Cost follows three things: how many systems have to be integrated, how much of your data model already exists and how clean it is, and how much of the interface is genuinely custom rather than standard forms and tables. A dashboard over one tidy database is a different build from a portal reconciling four systems that disagree. We don't publish rate cards, because a number without a scope is guesswork. Discovery ends with a phased plan and a fixed cost per phase, plus a running cost model separating our fees from the hosting and third-party services you pay for directly.

A focused internal tool or dashboard typically runs six to twelve weeks. A full product with authentication, payments, an admin back office, and several integrations usually runs four to nine months. The variable that moves the timeline most is not screen count but how many external systems you depend on and how quickly their owners can answer questions. We give you a phased plan at the end of discovery rather than a single date, so the first usable release lands well before the last one.

Yes, and usually without a full rewrite. We start by mapping what the current system does, what it integrates with, and which parts actually cause the pain, then replace it incrementally: a new front end against the existing API, or new services carved out behind a proxy while the old system keeps running. A rewrite is occasionally the right call, but it's the most expensive option and we won't recommend it before we've shown you what incremental modernization would cost instead.

Both. If you have Figma files and a design system, we build against them and will flag anything that won't hold up in a real browser at real data volumes, such as tables that assume a fixed row count or states that were never designed for empty, loading, or error. If you don't have designs, we build the component library and design tokens as part of the engagement so the product stays visually consistent as it grows.

We build to WCAG guidance as a default: semantic HTML, keyboard navigation, focus management, and contrast checked in the design system rather than audited at the end. Retrofitting accessibility into a finished component library costs several times what building it in does. If you have a specific compliance obligation, tell us the standard and level you're held to during discovery so we can build and test against it rather than approximate it.

A web app runs in the browser and works across every device from one codebase; a mobile app is installed from an app store and can reach deeper into device hardware. Many products need both, and the two can share logic. If you need a native experience, mobile app development is the better starting point, and we build those too.